[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autobeaming
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Autobeaming |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:13:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
> For varying time signatures changes could still
> be made via \overrideTimeSignatureSettings.
I consider it a grave user interface mistake to have some things work
only with \overrideTimeSignatureSettings, but not with
\override timeSignatureSettings.
It is already bad enough that the completely arbitrary keyword/object
relation override/revert->grob, set/unset->context is demanded from the
user. Now introducing artificial phrases that use the verb "override"
for operating on a context property is really going off the deep end.
Why have \overrideTimeSignatureSettings when timeSignatureSettings is
not to be associated with "override"?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Autobeaming, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/01
- Re: Autobeaming,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Autobeaming, Graham Percival, 2010/01/01