[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:27:19 +0100 |
Op maandag 04-01-2010 om 21:00 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> On 01/04/2010 05:11 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op maandag 04-01-2010 om 15:33 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Disregard what I said about building the documentation although it seems
> to take a long time. The "make web" target no longer exists, I'm trying
> it out with "make doc",
yes, doc and doc-install they're called now. Thought that only was on
the 2.13 branch...sorry.
> What would happen if I extracted the documentation tarball into `out-www' ?
It may just be that the docs do not build on suse and you won't know?
Have you seen the osc log message? That's exactly why not building the
docs is a bad idea. Apparently, the 2.12.2 docs did not build on
openSUSE x86_64; not good.
Did you consider the zypper source-install issue?
Greetings,
janneke
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, (continued)
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/04
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Dave Plater, 2010/01/04
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/04
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/04
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Dave Plater, 2010/01/04
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/05
- Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Dave Plater, 2010/01/05
- Interrupted builds: gs should remove broken output? [Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/05
- Re: Interrupted builds: gs should remove broken output? [Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond], Dave Plater, 2010/01/06
Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, Dave Plater, 2010/01/04
Re: [opensuse-contrib] lilypond, John Mandereau, 2010/01/04