|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: [tablatures] bends: pre-implementation issues |
Date: | Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:25:20 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Patrick Horgan schrieb:
Thanks for your hint! I wasn't referring to all possibilities, but mainly the three fundamental partsMarc Hohl wrote:You leave out the common case of a release bend without a pluck, following a bend. It's common in blues for example, to pluck, bend up a whole step, then back down a half step without an intervening pluck, for example leaving the string bent (and then of course shaking it all around). How would you notate that? _ / \ ~~~~~~~~~ note the ascii art won't work so well if you have variable width chars;) __/ PatrickHello all,I plan to work on the emplementation of bends for lilypond. Some preliminary tests with scheme were successful, so I want to go to the next stage soon andcreate some new engravers. But there are still some unsolved issues. But first, a brief explanation for all non-guitarists out there:a band is achieved by pressing down a string and moving it along the frets. The string gets bend, and the resulting tone gets higher. There are threevariants: 1) the bend (or bend up): plucking the string, then doing the bend2) release bend: plucking a already bent string. Sounds like a reverse bend. 3) pre bend: bend the unplucked string, pluck afterwards. Mostly (but not always)followed by a release bend.
which can be combined to more complex bend fingures. I would notate this as e \bend fis \release f (durations aside). Thanks, Marc
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |