[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:52:11 +0000 |
Suggestions:
1) stop sticking everything in the same thread; it makes it very hard
to keep track of what's happening.
2) I can't reproduce with some tests on programming-work.itexi based
on your description, so further debugging would be tricky for me.
3) this is a presentation issue, not a content issue. As long as it
compiles, push it, then let other people work on the presentation.
Based on your description, I gather that there's yet another bug in
lilypond-texi2html, which means that either John, me, or Patrick
should look at it. But since I can't reproduce the problem with
current git, push it so I can start working.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Mark Polesky <address@hidden> wrote:
> Unfortunately, there's a hierarchy problem with the
>
> address@hidden Technical details
>
> thing that had previously escaped my notice. I'm finding
> this really confusing so I'll try to be clear. And I could
> be wrong on some detail... Any instance of
>
> address@hidden foo
>
> that comes immediately after a
>
> address@hidden Technical details
>
> ends up in
>
> /technical-details.html#foo
>
> So now there's a page called technical-details.html which
> has the following nodes:
>
> Configuring Git (3rd subsubsec in 2.2.1)
> Downloading all remote branches (4th subsubsec in 2.2.2)
> Other branches (5th subsubsec in 2.2.2)
>
> This means that when you click the link for `Configuring
> Git', it takes you to the correct node (from 2.2.1), but the
> TOC pane now highlights `Downloading all remote branches'.
>
> Obviously, this is unacceptable, but I don't know how best
> to fix it. I have to say, I really like the `Technical
> details' idea. Visually, it's clear and it looks like it
> should work (semantically). But it screws with the menu
> and puts nodes out of order.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
> Thanks.
> - Mark
>
>
>
>
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, (continued)
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/11
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Graham Percival, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, John Mandereau, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Graham Percival, 2010/01/13
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Mark Polesky, 2010/01/14
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, John Mandereau, 2010/01/14
Re: CG chapter 2, first draft, Trevor Daniels, 2010/01/14