Re: 2.13.18 might not contain everything

[Carl Sorensen]

On 4/17/10 7:08 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:27:09PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2010/4/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>> My git history looks a bit weird (I think I forgot to push at the
>>> right time), and a quick check indicates that the fix to 1027 (a doc
>>> fix added a few days ago) wasn't included.
>> 
>> I rebased (instead of pulling) and now we have some repeated commits
>> in lilypond/translation.
> 
> I'm not concerned about the release (any missing bugfixes will be
> in .19 anyway), but does this matter for the commit history?  I
> mean, we had a week of git not-really-working while Jan made
> multiple different versions of the repository; would something
> like that be required in the future?

It looks to me like we have lots of duplicated commits on master.

But I'm not a git expert.

Carl