|
| From: | David Kastrup |
| Subject: | Re: Rationale for LaTeX lilypond-book syntax? |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:46:12 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, [c16 d e f] is *not* valid lilypond. The first brace needs to
> come after the c16:
> So I don't think there's a problem with the options coming after the
> {lilypond}.
Oh right. Wow.
--
David Kastrup
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |