[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: order of engravers

From: Neil Puttock
Subject: Re: order of engravers
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:50:55 +0100

On 28 April 2010 13:41, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> And if each engraver specifies what engravers it is relying on in a
> machine-readable manner (or the respective order in which it wants to be
> applied), then Lilypond can actually do the required sorting and figure
> out a proper order at runtime.

I agree, there's no point in providing automated documentation unless
the dependencies are also resolved automatically (which turns it from
being a quick frog task into something a bit more involved).

There's already limited support for ordering via the method
Translator::must_be_last () (and must-be-last in a scheme engraver),
which is used to ensure Axis_group_engraver is always the last
engraver in a context definition.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]