[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:57:42 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Nicolas Sceaux
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> What type signatures would be actually permissable under the assumption
>>> that they are supported by lexer and parser?
>>> It is somewhat clear to me that we can't have markup-list followed by
>>> markup in the arguments.  Anything else?
>> I'd say, a markup-list command signature should follow the pattern:
>>   scheme* markup* markup-list*
>> that is, any number of scheme arguments, then any number of single markup
>> arguments, then any number of markup-list arguments, even though I don't
>> know if having several markup list arguments is useful or not (and if it's
>> doable).
> AFAICR the ordering is just there for syntax consistency. If you can
> make a patch that generalizes markup argument handling like the
> argument handling for music functions, that would be awesome.

Well, they need to be in order yet.  But other than that, the dependency
appears to be gone.

Check out <URL:>

Should I post the patch series to the list?

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]