Re: [PATCH] Doc: LM: Reformat ly code.

[Mark Polesky]

Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> I think we should always use bar-checks when the piece
>> is more than one bar long.  That's a good habit to get
>> into; we ought to start it right from the first.
>
> I would agree with this.  In fact I put bar checks into
> quite a few of the examples in the LM originally, but they
> seem to have been removed.

Perhaps the reason for removing the bar checks was that
they're not explained at all in the LM.  Do you think we
should mention bar checks (briefly) near the beginning of
the LM, without going into detail?  Then we'd be justified
using them in the examples.

- Mark