[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rietveld review
From: |
Christian Hitz |
Subject: |
Re: Rietveld review |
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2010 19:32:10 +0200 |
Am 04.05.2010 um 14:39 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I like the thought of just switching to another developer's branch to
>> review, instead of creating my own branch, applying the patch, and
>> then testing.
>
> Well, unless the patch fails, there is not much of a difference. For
> divergent development, however, it might help that one is talking about
> the same thing.
>
>> But I also really like the side-by-side review with inlined comments
>> that Rietveld offers.
>
> gerrit?
Another possibility could be Gitorious (http://gitorious.org).
/Christian
- Re: Rietveld review, (continued)
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/06
- Re: Rietveld review,
Christian Hitz <=
- Re: Rietveld review, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Rietveld review, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Boris Shingarov, 2010/05/03