[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [frogs] Issue 736041: Lilypond issues success/failure termination me
Re: [frogs] Issue 736041: Lilypond issues success/failure termination message - OK to push?
Sun, 09 May 2010 00:21:08 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:22.214.171.124) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 06/05/10 01:17, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 5/5/10 11:03 AM, "Ian Hulin"<address@hidden> wrote:
I put this patch up for review about a month back.� Patrick has given some
feedback and I have implemented his comments.� Could someone have a look and
if it's OK push, please?
I didn't see any issues in the patch, except that I was not sure that the
discussion on -devel had reached resolution:
Did we ever achieve resolution on this?
I see votes for
Han-Wen: Not in this format; give a summary of the results
James Lowe: Yes, if you add the name of the output file
Mark Polesky: Yes
Bert: Not needed, because the GUI can show the error message from the
So the majority says go ahead, I think. Han-Wen, are you OK with that?
Since submitting my original patch, there's a tracker open to add a -q
option to Lilypond to implement Unix-style 'quiet' processing of all
informational progress messages during a Lilypond compilation run.
This and the request for a message with a summary of results of
compiling all files during a compilation session are enhancement
requests on top of this patch and beyond the scope of what I wanted to