[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bounties
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: bounties |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2010 15:55:32 +0100 |
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty". Many come from more
>> than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open".
>
> Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer?
Whoever wrote the patch, I assume. But I really don't see this
working as an official system at the moment.
> Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my own in order to
> get them committed.
Heh.
BTW, although I gave the generalized markup-command patch a
"priority-low", that's just because I don't understand it and AFAIK
it's not in response to a high-priority issue. It still shows up in
the list of patches:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=label%3Apatch
and I (unofficially) consider all of those to be release-blockers -- I
don't want to release 2.14 if there's unresolved patches floating
around.
Cheers,
- Graham