[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order" |
Date: |
Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:27 +0200 |
2010/5/21 James Lowe <address@hidden>:
> I can try to fix this. I'll have a go anyway - however can anyone tell me if
> it matters to the code if the @menu item has to be *exactly* the same as the
> @node (which is also missing I notice) and the @unnumberedsubsubsec.
I think texinfo, makeinfo and others will complain if not. I could be wrong.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
- broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/20
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/20
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order",
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Francisco Vila, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21