|
From: | Ian Hulin |
Subject: | Re: Add user-init option to include a custom init snippet (not replacing the whole init file) (issue1901042) |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:49:48 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
Hi Reinhold, On 28/07/10 01:43, address@hidden wrote:
Reviewers: Neil Puttock, http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001 File ly/init.ly (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/1901042/diff/2001/3001#newcode26 ly/init.ly:26: #(if (ly:get-option 'user-init) On 2010/07/27 20:16:58, Neil Puttock wrote:user-include ?Hmm, actually, I don't like either user-init (indicates it's part of the init sequence and has similar uses as the --init command line option; also it sounds too technical) nor user-include (to me that sounds like setting an include path)... How about custom-definitions or user-definitions (no, sounds too much like it defines users)?
How about --user-startup or --custom-startup? The real problem you have here is that we use --init option to supersede the whole startup/initialization file. This one is an additional one to do just for this user session, so user-startup says what it does on the can. Cheers, Ian
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |