Re: What's with the spacing code?

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> I have to disagree with your assessment: the behavior of 12.3 made sense
> under the constraints the code worked with.  It was a result of its
> design decisions.  The result of 13.35 does not make sense.  As you can
> easily see by removing the markup, it is not a result of a generally
> wider spacing decision.
>
> If you think different, how about the following:

[...]

It is particularly educational to look at the distances used in the last
page.  They don't particularly look like the general spacing is intended
to be on the loose side.

-- 
David Kastrup