[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Nov 2010 20:08:06 -0700 (PDT) |
Keith E OHara wrote:
> I had imagined you would simultaneously change
> staff-affinity (UP / DOWN / CENTER)
> to reference-direction (UP / DOWN / CENTER)
> so we can remember that this direction tells us which
> staff is which between referencestaff and oppositestaff.
I think staff-affinity is more informative than
reference-direction.
> The closest I could find to a flaw was that
> nonstaff-unrelatedstaff-spacing also determines the space
> between an UP nonstaff and a DOWN nonstaff (if there is no
> CENTER nonstaff between them)...
I *think* that's just a case of stretching to prevent
collisions. Does the same happen when all the
'stretchability and 'padding keys are set to 0? If yes,
please post a minimal example.
- Mark
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, (continued)
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Jan Warchoł, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Jan Warchoł, 2010/11/04
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/04
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/06
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Keith E OHara, 2010/11/06
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/07