[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Nov 2010 07:43:53 +0100 (CET) |
> Renaming proposals, round 4:
>
> CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME
> ------------ -------------
> next-staff staff-staff
> default-next-staff default-staff-staff
>
> inter-staff nonstaff-relatedstaff
> inter-loose-line nonstaff-nonstaff
> non-affinity nonstaff-unrelatedstaff
>
> between-staff withingroup-staff-staff
> after-last-staff staffgroup-staff
This is fine with me.
> And lastly, I still think reference/opposite is better than
> related/unrelated:
>
> nonstaff-referencestaff
> nonstaff-oppositestaff
Well, `related/unrelated' refers to the functionality, and `reference'
too. However, `opposite' refers to a visual concept which IMHO
doesn't harmonize well with the other terms.
Werner
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, (continued)
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Jan Warchoł, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/03
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Jan Warchoł, 2010/11/04
- Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Trevor Daniels, 2010/11/04
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/06
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Keith E OHara, 2010/11/06
Re: renaming "vertical spacing inside systems" props, Mark Polesky, 2010/11/07