[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043)
From: |
Carl . D . Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043) |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:12:48 +0000 |
Here's a new version of the patch that tries to eliminate any scheme
calls, and demonstrates my problem.
I need to do a check on the left bound to see if it's a grob, because if
I take the check out I get a Bus error.
I don't know how to do such a check from C++ -- I think it's done by
casting, but I'm not sure.
If I self-scm() the C++ Item * variable, then use the scheme routine
ly:grob? to check if it's a grob, if I get a Bus error.
Neil, can you give me any insight here? I'd like to use all C++
variables, and eliminate the two remaining scheme calls.
As it stands, the code works on my machine.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/2723043/
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), (continued)
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), n . puttock, 2010/11/03
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/03
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/06
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/07
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), marc, 2010/11/07
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/11
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/11
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043),
Carl . D . Sorensen <=
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), n . puttock, 2010/11/12
- Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/11/13
Re: Add tab-tie-follow-engraver (issue2723043), Marc Hohl, 2010/11/13