[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: music function
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Fw: music function |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:41:19 -0000 |
This is the second time this has come up recently.
Sounds like a good candidate for an enhancement request.
Trevor
----- Original Message -----
From: "jakob lund" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:22 AM
Subject: music function
Hi
I have two questions that I hope someone here can answer.
I have something like this
\repeat volta 4 { ... music ... }
There are no alternative endings, so the number 4 doesn't show up in
the output.
I would like the text "×4" to appear below the closing repeat mark
(dotted bar line). Is there already a way
to do that? (there ought to be but I can't seem to find it...)
Using \mark is no good, because I already have a mark on that bar
line. Thus far I came up with:
repeatTimes = #(define-music-function (parser location r) (integer?)
#{
\bar ""
\once \override Score.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\time 1/32
s32-\markup{\concat{ $(markup (number->string r)) "×" } }
\once \override Score.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\time 4/4
#})
(the technique is adapted from the snippet titled "Creating
simultaneous rehearsal marks"
from the lilypond documentation.) So now I write
\repeat volta 4 { ... music ... \repeatTimes #4 }
which gives sort of the desired result. My second question is: Can
I,
perhaps using the 'parser' argument, access
(a) the `current time signature' (so I can get rid of the
hard-coded 4/4 at the end) and
(b) the argument to `\repeat volta' (so I won't have to supply
the
argument #4, which is redundant 'cause I already put `volta 4') ?
Regards
Jakob Lund.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Fw: music function,
Trevor Daniels <=