[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.14 release, or GOP now (part 2)
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: 2.14 release, or GOP now (part 2) |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:55:40 -0700 |
On 11/30/10 1:04 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:37:08AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> What about option 0 -- try to coordinate the resources we currently have
>> available on the critical issues?
>
> I would like that. I'm a bit surprised to see so many people
> talking about branching a stable/2.14 -- I don't think that would
> solve anything. I'm willing to try it as an experiment, but I
> really doubt that having a separate branch would encourage more
> people to spend more time on critical issues.
>
> Instead of doubles tennis, let's play volleyball. Let's all (or
> at least, everybody other than Joe+Neil+John) works together on an
> issue. Instead of one person hitting the ball back, let's have
> multiple people stop the ball, set it up, and then send it back.
OK, I'm up for a volleyball game.
> However, I'm not sufficiently motivated to do it all by myself if
> lots of other people are only working on new features or
> discussing policy changes. If they're having fun, then I want to
> have fun too. But if there's a solid core of people doing the
> hard work of trying to fix critical issues, then I will absolutely
> be part of that group.
Me too.
Thanks,
Carl