[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.41 and near future
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.41 and near future |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:28:24 +0100 |
reverting is OK since the patch is wrong ad Valentin asks for it, right?
Let me think about that. What I would like is for Valentin
to fix it the way he thinks it's best. Eg: two patches, one simple
git revert --no-edit and the new patch. I don't like reverting other
people's patches.
Graham Percival schreef op di 07-12-2010 om 12:09 [+0000]:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Valentin Villenave
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Here's a new patch that you can use instead of the previous one.
> > (Since you've reverted it.) Please let me know how that works!
>
> Jan, where are we on this?
> - do you want to officially git revert Valentin's previous patch, then
> apply this one instead?
> - do you want to ask Valentin to create a patch from current git head?
>
> I'd like to make another unstable release in the next day or two (when
> 1427 is fixed), so it would be nice if this could be sorted out. I
> don't know what the original patch was doing, so I'm not eager to jump
> in and examine the new one.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.nl