[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: CG: clarify lily-git.tcl and git-cl. (issue3396042)
From: |
percival . music . ca |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: CG: clarify lily-git.tcl and git-cl. (issue3396042) |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:27:18 +0000 |
On 2010/12/06 23:12:09, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Hi Graham,
LGTM as well. Just a few comments:
Thanks, pushed.
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:143: @quotation
Is there a rule for the use of @quotation? (I noticed there's another
one in
source-code.itexi.) If so, we probably should add it to the CG's
Syntax Survey.
No, but I don't think we need to mention it. The CG is a special case;
the usual docs shouldn't use quotation.
I wouldn't bother with the size limit, it's much less drastic on
address@hidden What I
*would* mention, however, is to add [PATCH] in the email's subject.
Thanks, done.
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1032: You must have a
gmail account.
Are all Google accounts Gmail accounts? (I don't suppose it's owrth
adding a
@uref{https://www.google.com/accounts/NewAccount} link, is it?)
I don't know; I just left that part of the docs alone. Once the current
discussion about virtualization dies down, I'll ask somebody to look
into gmail vs. google accounts.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3396042/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi#newcode1051
Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi:1051: answer with a
newline (CR).
How about "just hit Return"?
I think that "newline (CR)" is a bit more technical, so I left it as-is.
I'm not particularly fussy about this, though.
http://codereview.appspot.com/3396042/