[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: regtest

From: Dmytro O. Redchuk
Subject: Re: regtest
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:36:46 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue 14 Dec 2010, 15:12 Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:55 PM
> >
> >On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk"
> ><address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >>I fail to see why this test ( would be less
> >>valuable
> >>if there
> >>would be "\key c \major", let's say.
> >>
> >
> >Because you want to ensure that it behaves properly. The best fix,
> >IMO, would be to add "The first note has a natural followed by a
> >sharp" at the beginning of the description.
> +1
> The test also shows the cancelling natural behaves
> properly too- appearing once but only only once in the
> bar.  A key of C would not show this.  You could argue
> that this should be in a separate test, but why not
> combine them?
Well, ok, I would  not argue.

ps. 10 posts in this thread -- definitely, something should be changed in
    test's description, i guess. Probably, i would propose smth like this:
    "The first note has a sharp, preceeded by a natural (because of key
    signature). The second note does not get any sign. The third and fourth
    show forced and cautionary accidentals".

  Dmytro O. Redchuk
  Bug Squad

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]