Re: issue classification: priority guidelines

[Phil Holmes]

What I'm trying to do is document a categorisation that makes the job of the 
bug squad easier.  Unless anyone says no, I'll ask for the changes proposed 
to be made.

--
Phil Holmes


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden>
To: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden>; "lilypond-devel" 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: issue classification: priority guidelines


2010/12/15 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> In the mean time, go ahead and twiddle the definitions of
> priorities (as long as you leave Critical alone). But be aware
> that you're "rearranging deck chairs on the titanic".

ROTFL -- my point exactly :-)

Cheers,
V.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel