[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements (issue3989
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements (issue3989049) |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:20:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:17:46AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> Just some minor syntax changes to make it read better. I hope no one is
> offended.
Not offended, but unfortunately I already pushed it. Could you
make these changes to git?
I don't want to slow down code development by asking non-English
speakers to revise text a lot. As long as the doc team can
understand it, I think it's best for programmers to be
programming.
> Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:500:
> General: There is an inconsistency using 'notehead' vs 'note head', so
> we need to pick one and stick with it. There is nothing in the CG (yet)
> and so we could make a policy if someone has a strong opinion on this.
address@hidden:~/src/lilypond/Documentation/contributor$ grep
notehead *
doc-work.itexi:@emph{Note head} NOT notehead.
that seems like a pretty clear policy. I didn't check this in the
patch, though.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: regression tests for white mensural ligature enhancements (issue3989049),
Graham Percival <=