Re: [PATCHES] Documentation for some of my features in 2.13

[Reinhold Kainhofer]

> What would possibly be more useful to doc volunteers, and more
> productive of developers' time, might be to post a draft, outline, or
> series of bullet points, probably on bug-, so the doc people can take
> the patch process from the start.   With devs putting doc patches on
> Reitveldt, at least one doc person isn't sure whether it's a good idea
> to suggest improvements to the dev who started the patch, and waste more
> of his time. AIUI, to get out of this situation, Reinhold should revert
> his patch, and I can then take the content and put it through channels,
> handling any further work on it, while Reinhold gets back to his work.

I'm fine with that, too. Can you simply take the patch from rietveld and 
improve it, or shall I send them as attachments to bug-lilypond? Or shall I 
even push these raw patches so that you (or whoever else wants to improve them) 
can work directly on git?

Cheers,
Reinhold