[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue 1294 - Lyric ties
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Issue 1294 - Lyric ties |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:51:27 -0000 |
I'm checking some of the lyric-based issues in case they've been fixed in
the latest release, and came back across
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1294
which reported that Lyric ties do not work in 2.13. It was added as a
regression, then downgraded for reasons that aren't entirely clear to me
except that the reasons for it aren't clearly understood. I think it was
believed that adding "The lyric tie is implemented with the Unicode
character U+203F, so be sure to have a font (like DejaVuLGC) installed that
includes this glyph." to the NR was a good enough workaround.
I don't believe it is. A minor nitpick is that DejaVuLGC does not include
this glyph in its seriffed versions, AFAICS - it's in DejaVu Sans - a sans
serif font. Now, I've just gone and got both of those fonts and installed
them. If I explicitly set the LyricText font-name to DejaVu Sans, then I
get satisfactory lyric ties. If I don't, then I get short lyric ties,
different from the documented output. My test file as below gives the
attached image.
{
\time 3/4
\relative c' { c2 e4 g2 e4 }
\addlyrics { gran- de_a- mi- go }
\addlyrics { pu- "ro y ho-" nes- to }
\addlyrics { pu- ro~y~ho- nes- to }
\addlyrics {
\override LyricText #'font-name = #"DejaVu Sans"
pu- ro~y~ho- nes- to
}
}
Now - there's one other interesting feature here. If I delete the fourth
line of the lyrics above (the one with the explicit font) and run Lily
2.13.49, saving the PS file, it has the following in the postscript header:
%%DocumentMedia: a4 595.28 841.89 80 () ()
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font CenturySchL-Roma
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Emmentaler-20
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font MS-Gothic
%%EndComments
If I run the same file in 2.12.3 I get:
%%DocumentMedia: a4 595.28 841.89 80 () ()
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font CenturySchL-Roma
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font DejaVuSans
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font Emmentaler-20
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: font feta-alphabet20
%%EndComments
which is interesting - 2.12 has found a font with the glyph in, and has
automatically used it. 2.13 doesn't do this.
Sorry - but this, for me, is back to looking like a regression.
--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad
LyricTie.png
Description: PNG image
- Issue 1294 - Lyric ties,
Phil Holmes <=
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Phil Holmes, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Patrick McCarty, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Patrick McCarty, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Phil Holmes, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Carl Sorensen, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Graham Percival, 2011/02/12
- Re: Issue 1294 - Lyric ties, Bernard Hurley, 2011/02/12