lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Add modal transformations provided by Mike Ellis (issue4079064)


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: Add modal transformations provided by Mike Ellis (issue4079064)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:04:43 -0000


address@hidden> wrote Saturday, February 05, 2011 6:20 PM

http://codereview.appspot.com/4079064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode827
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:827: it may be converted to its
@notation{retrograde} (written backwards).
I'm not certain you need to spell out "written backwards". You haven't
said what "inverted" or "transposed" means, after all!

If you're paranoid, then how about adding a stub to the music glossary, and a @rgloss{} to the @seealso ? (or actually add a full entry to the
glossary if you want)

I'll do this as a separate patch after this has been pushed.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4079064/diff/1/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely#newcode855
Documentation/notation/pitches.itely:855: \new Staff {
I know that you don't want to hear this at this point, but...

You know, all these examples are beautifully written and are very clear. I think we could have capitalized on this by doing everything at once.

I think it would have been a little too long.

(BTW, do you actually need the \score and \new Staff in these? My first guess would be that a simple \relative c' would suffice, but maybe I'm
wrong or maybe the transposing complicates the \relative)

\modalTranspose and the other functions have problems
inside \relative blocks.  Ordinary \transpose is similar.
I can get away with just a \new Staff, so I'll change to
this.

Trevor





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]