[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: shortened flags affair, part 3 - 32nds stem length
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:41:45 +0000

On 3/8/11, Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> wrote:
> i don't see any discussion going on here, so i assume you agree to
> shortening the 32nd unbeamed stem.
> I attach the patch.

IMO, there are two steps to this type of change:

1. discuss the aesthetics (or "beautiful notation").  That discussion
seems to be over.

2. discuss the technical patch.  That discussion may or may not be
over, but I haven't seen it "officially" start.

Could you upload this patch to rietveld?  Once that's done, if the
patch passes the "obvious" checks, I'll include it in a 48-hour patch

Sorry for the extra caution, but I'm not going to push changes to the
fonts on my own authority.  I want to give plenty of time for people
familiar with the topic to object, once it's clear that we have a
precise patch on the table rather than a general discussion..

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]