[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld |
Date: |
Mon, 2 May 2011 00:41:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 11:54:43PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 1. Mai 2011, um 23:36:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > If you did not place the git-cl binary there,
> > you can't use git cl instead. If you did place it there, you can't use
> > git-cl as it won't be in the path.
>
> Clearly no problem as git searches the path.
Yes. I'm aware (or at least, I remember a rumor to the effect)
that git is getting rid of the "dashed" form of the commands in a
future version. But by that time, Phil will be running lilydev,
so manually installing git-cl won't be a problem.
My "it's fine either way" was very much directed at this specific
case, not a general recommendation for git/git-cl use.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Phil Holmes, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Graham Percival, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Phil Holmes, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Graham Percival, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Phil Holmes, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Graham Percival, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Phil Holmes, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, David Kastrup, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/05/01
- Re: Uploading a patch to Rietveld,
Graham Percival <=