[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: make doc

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: make doc
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 18:40:57 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:25:20PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Is the aim with make docs to try to make it silent, unless there are
> errors, like we have done with make website?

Yes.  Ideally we should have no texinfo errors, no .ly errors, etc

> I realise that to make this happen there will have to be lots of
> work to understand it better,

ETA: 150 hours for the English docs alone.  Another 50-100 hours
for the translations.

> Is it worth raising a tracking issue report?

I wouldn't bother adding an issue to the tracker, but there's
certainly no harm in doing so.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]