Re: GOP-PROP 2: mentors and Frogs

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:01:37PM +0200, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/6/18 Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> > Here's the responsibilities for mentors.  Do any of these seem too
> > heavy?  We can relax/remove any that are a sticking point for many
> > people.
> 
> I see that these are the same that we have in CG plus one new, about
> weekly checks.

Yes, that is correct.

> > 5. Keep track of patches from your contributor. If you’ve sent a
> >   patch to -devel, it’s your responsibility to pester people to
> >   get comments for it, or at very least add it to the google
> >   tracker.
> 
> I suggest to write about Rietveld reviews explicitely.

Good point, done.

> I also think it should be mentor's responsibility, not a "very
> least option", to add patch to google tracker.

err, I think this is an English expression.  Saying "or at the
very least add it to the google tracker" means that it is indeed
responsibility.  I've reworded that sentence.

> I suggest one more: if you are working on something not very
> difficult, ask your 'apprentices' to review *your* patches! In this
> case "please review" would mean "please check if you can understand
> what is going on here".

Good suggestion, added!

Cheers,
- Graham