lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: an example of minimal example (issue4636082)


From: lemniskata . bernoullego
Subject: Re: an example of minimal example (issue4636082)
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 22:39:06 +0000

Reverted sentence about \version.

Ready to go?


http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/diff/4002/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode311
Documentation/web/community.itexi:311: Specify which release of LilyPond
you are using with a
On 2011/07/07 10:26:39, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2011/07/06 17:44:37, Janek Warchol wrote:
> Hmm, what about "Specify which "code{\version} of LilyPond you are
using."?

hmm, that's better, but it still feels a bit wordy.

I'm not feeling enthusiastic about this change.  Do we have any
evidence that
"include the \version number" is misunderstood?  If you can point to 3
emails to
bug-lilypond where people misunderstood this, then I'm fine with a
more wordy
explanation.

No, i don't have any proofs, it was just a guess.  Scrap it then.

(that said, adding the @code{} around \version is still a good change)

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/4636082/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]