[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 1724 -> 620 : workaround?
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 1724 -> 620 : workaround? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:15:49 +0200 |
On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround
>> I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached
>> to #1724 ?
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724
>
> Let me think about it for a bit. I have an idea using a scheme
> engraver which might work.
>
>> PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the
>> consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to
>> understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue.
>
> You're welcome to add snippets to it rather than relying on the links
> to the merged issues (we could also mention the Dynamics context in
> the issue title).
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
I ran into the exact same thing in a score I'm working on and proposed a patch
to devel - lemme know what ya'll think!
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Issue 1724 -> 620 : workaround?,
address@hidden <=