[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function semantics
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: music function semantics |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:10:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Puttock <address@hidden> writes:
> On 26 July 2011 22:41, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> So the question basically is: which of those mechanisms is actually
>> being in use? Are there examples for existing music functions
>> interpreting a postevent or a chord constituent?
>
> \tweak would be the most common usage for both of these cases:
>
> c1-\tweak #'color #red -\fermata
>
> and
>
> < \tweak #'color #red c>1
So much for my "nobody needs that" theory. The problem I have is that
accepting \transpose in all the same places as \tweak does not seem like
a good idea.
On the other hand, whether an error gets thrown by the parser or by the
expression builder might not make that much of a difference to the end
user than it feels like making to me.
--
David Kastrup
- music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/26
- Re: music function semantics, Neil Puttock, 2011/07/26
- Re: music function semantics,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: music function semantics, Jan Warchoł, 2011/07/29
- Re: music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/29
- Re: music function semantics, Jan Warchoł, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Carl Sorensen, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Jan Warchoł, 2011/07/30
- RE: music function semantics, James Lowe, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Carl Sorensen, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Carl Sorensen, 2011/07/30