[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?)
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 01:14:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) |
Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 00:42:58 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Freitag, 29. Juli 2011, 18:20:25 schrieben Sie:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:30:24PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > > [/home/reinhold/lilypond/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/string-tunings
> > > -
> > >
> > > init.ly
> > > Using `nederlands' note names...
> > > [<string>]
> > > [<string>]
> >
> > Could somebody get rid of these already? They're left-over from
> > Valentin's note name changes from Dec 2010 or so; they were
> > debugging messages which were supposed to be removed, but weren't
> > completely removed.
>
> I don't see an easy way to get rid of them. The only possibility I see is
> to completely remove the debug output in (notice the second argument!)
> Includable_lexer::new_input (string name, string data, Sources *sources)
> which is the function to include the given data. In that case, we don't
> have any filename to print, so we might simply remove the debug output
> altogether.
On second thought, we might still print [<string>], but simply not add a
linebreak there? My --loglevel patch allows this to be tweaked (in
pariticular, call debug_output(..., false) instad of debug_output(...) ).
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Phil Holmes, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Graham Percival, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Graham Percival, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Neil Puttock, 2011/07/29
- debug spam (was: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?)), Graham Percival, 2011/07/30
Fwd: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/29
- Re: Fwd: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?),
Reinhold Kainhofer <=