[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
debug spam (was: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?))
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
debug spam (was: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?)) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 15:10:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:36:38PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 29 July 2011 17:20, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Could somebody get rid of these already? They're left-over from
> > Valentin's note name changes from Dec 2010 or so;
>
> They come from parsing string-tunings-init.ly.
> > they were debugging messages which were supposed to be
> > removed, but weren't completely removed.
> No, parsing a string via ly:parser-parse-string (which is ultimately
> what the hash-extend syntax for parsing .ly code inside scheme via #{
> ... #} uses) causes the lexer to set new input called `<string>'.
Why do we output lexer input in this case, but not other cases?
I cannot see how 20 [<string>] (whether or not they're on
newlines) could in any way help debugging. I think the underlying
architecture should be reworked so that we don't see that stuff.
Bottom line: C++ only prints stuff with printf() and cout/cerr;
guile on prints stuff with (display...) and related functions. We
have control over all that code. This isn't an urgent problem by
any means, but I think it *is* a problem, and if fixing this
requires some low-level changes, so be it.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), (continued)
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Phil Holmes, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Graham Percival, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Graham Percival, 2011/07/29
- Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Neil Puttock, 2011/07/29
- debug spam (was: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?)),
Graham Percival <=
Fwd: Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 2?), Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/29