[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auto numbering footnote checkin doesn't play with \null and \musicgl
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: auto numbering footnote checkin doesn't play with \null and \musicglyph |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:47:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic; KDE/4.7.0; i686; ; ) |
Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2011, 16:39:59 schrieben Sie:
> > An example of some undesired ordering is the other example I sent a
> > few days
> > ago. The first system is utterly messed up (maybe a bug), but there
> > are also
> > other "issues": The hairpin gets the footnote printed at the right
> > end, but
> > since it started earlier than another footnoted grob, its number is
> > lower than
> > a footnote printed before it.
>
> Actually, I may have spoken too soon re the hairpin: I can fully
> conceive of the problem save one case.
>
> If one does \autoFootnoteGrob #'Hairpin #'(0 . -1) "foo" a\<
> \autoFootnoteGrob #'NoteHead #'(0 . -1) "foo" b
> \autoFootnoteGrob #'NoteHead #'(0 . -1) "foo" c
> \autoFootnoteGrob #'NoteHead #'(0 . -1) "foo" d
> \autoFootnoteGrob #'NoteHead #'(0 . -1) "foo" e f\!
>
> I am not sure where the resulting number of the footnote should fall in
> the categorization scheme with respect to other footnoted grobs. Any
> thoughts?
I would say number them in order of visual appearance. E.g. if the footnote
for the hairpin is printed at the beginning, treat it as if it were at moment
0, if the footnote sign is printed at the end treat it as if it were added at
moment 6/4 in this case. That's what I would expect as a music user.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org