[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:26:12 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:12:26PM +0000, James Lowe wrote:
> It probably annoys some because they then feel obligated but
> this is where I think GOP 8 blurs over to GOP 7. I get a bit
> exhausted keeping track of it all which is a negative thing,
...
> We don't have a GOP for 'isn't there a better way to keep track
> of issues AND upload patches' I see though.
It's being worked on.
Scheduling GOP stuff is a combination of "what do we have
available", "how much time+effort do I have in the next few
weeks", and "how much time+effort do I think the community wants
to spend on hot air for the next few weeks".
Cheers,
- Graham
- GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Graham Percival, 2011/08/02
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, address@hidden, 2011/08/02
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Keith OHara, 2011/08/02
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Keith OHara, 2011/08/05
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Jan Warchoł, 2011/08/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Wols Lists, 2011/08/06
- RE: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, James Lowe, 2011/08/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Jan Warchoł, 2011/08/07
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities, Phil Holmes, 2011/08/02