Re: 2.15.8 Regtests

[David Kastrup]

Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:

> No need for a new tracked issue.  'nested-property-revert.ly' was the test
> for issue 1063.  
>
> It is now clear that issue 1063 was never really fixed. The goal was to 
> make \revert restore the default value in more situations.  
> The patch made 'nested-property-revert.ly' work, 
>       but made 'property-nested-revert.ly' fail,
> as noted in issue 1771.  These similarly-named tests cover the same concept.
>
> Version 2.14 did not actually get the desired behavior that issue 1063 asked
> for, so there is no meaningful regression. 
>
> Unless somebody objects, I will remove 'nested-property-revert.ly' from 
> the test suite; The test code still exists in the open issue 1063.

I'd like to keep this test as I am working on the full functionality.
It will likely get extended in the end to cover more cases, but it is
useful as a start already.

-- 
David Kastrup