Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)

[Keith OHara]

On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:06:16 -0700, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:59:02AM +0000, Keith OHara wrote:
> > Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes:
> >
> > > Type-critical:
> > >
> > You might want to split this into two:
> >  regressions to the output of Lilypond, and
> >  critical impediments to development
>
> Why bother splitting it?  I forsee an average weekly count of 2
> Critical regressions, and 0.15 critical impediments to
> development.

Good point. Probably not worth splitting them.
I was merely noting that they are conceptually different.

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:02:51 -0700, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:

> > > Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes:
> > > >     * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the
> > > >       correct output should look like.
> Why not use a label to indicate this? That would enable a short
> list of these to be displayed if someone
> came across a pertinent example but couldn't
> remember the issue number.

That will work; now we can think of a name for the label.
Need_clarification
Need_goal
What_should_Lily_do