[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054)
|
From: |
Bertrand Bordage |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:18:14 +0200 |
I think so.
I'm already writing a section called "C/Scheme interface" where I explain that scm_integer_p (x) == SCM_BOOL_T isn't correct.
I also start a list of functions like to_boolean explaining why and how to use them.
As an expert of these issues, you will probably want to add some details after I push that :)
Bertrand
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), (continued)
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), reinhold . kainhofer, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), n . puttock, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), dak, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), dak, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), cecile . hauchemaille, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), dak, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), Graham Percival, 2011/08/18
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), David Kastrup, 2011/08/19
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054),
Bertrand Bordage <=
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), David Kastrup, 2011/08/19
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), Bertrand Bordage, 2011/08/19
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/08/19
- Re: Fixes boolean/SCM confusions, part 1. (issue 4875054), David Kastrup, 2011/08/19