[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 491
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:07:03 -0600 |
On 8/19/11 4:35 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 06:04:38PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
>> I have some comments about the docs. I think they're too tutorial, and
>> I think the exhaustive lists are unwieldy and should be eliminated. THe
>> source should be the reference.
>
> On the long term, I agree with Carl. In the short term, I think
> the docs should be pushed "as-is". It's easy to make editorial
> fixes later; I want us (meaning Bertrand and the programmers
> commenting on this stuff) to get into the habit of archiving
> information first, and playing with formatting later.
I totally agree.
Carl
- lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), bordage . bertrand, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), percival . music . ca, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), n . puttock, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), n . puttock, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), bordage . bertrand, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), n . puttock, 2011/08/19
- Re: lily-guile updates and CG: "Scheme->C interface" section. (issue 4917044), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/08/20