[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bisection/merge commits
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Bisection/merge commits |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:24:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:14:10AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> P.S.: After thinking about it, I decided I don't want to try to fix this
> part of the history.
+1. It's just too risky to mess with git.
> In future, rebase using --preserve-merges, and sorry for not noticing
> this earlier.
will do, and not your fault for not catching it. A few little
thigns like this is completely expected.
- Graham
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, (continued)
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, Graham Percival, 2011/10/26
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, Colin Campbell, 2011/10/26
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, David Kastrup, 2011/10/26
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, Graham Percival, 2011/10/26
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, David Kastrup, 2011/10/26
- Re: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027, Graham Percival, 2011/10/26
- Bisection/merge commits (was: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027), David Kastrup, 2011/10/27
- Re: Bisection/merge commits (was: PATCH: Countdown to 20111027), Graham Percival, 2011/10/27
- Re: Bisection/merge commits, David Kastrup, 2011/10/27
- Re: Bisection/merge commits, David Kastrup, 2011/10/27
- Re: Bisection/merge commits,
Graham Percival <=