[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patchy and dev/staging

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Patchy and dev/staging
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:26:07 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:35:29PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> If James uses patch from lilypond-extra
>   e52f265dd585050fe74250fd291d85886b7f653f
> then AFAIK patchy is "stupid enough".  It's doing
>   git clone --mirror -s %s .git
>   git --git-dir=.git config core.bare false
>   git checkout origin/master
>   git merge --ff-only origin/dev/staging
> and then testing the result.  If it fails at any step (be it a git
> command,, configure, make, make test, or make doc) then
> it bails.

Well, now we are in the lucky situation of being able to test how patchy
fares when somebody has committed to master bypassing dev/staging (since
it looks like Ian did that with

    commit 1c8ae9fb4170bb2566c2acb1a11155c23c12cfdc
    Author: Ian Hulin <address@hidden>
    Date:   Tue Nov 8 12:29:23 2011 +0000

        Tracker 2025 - move safe utility to separate module to aid Guile V2 

        lily.scm (define safe-objects) and (define-macro define-safe-public)
         moved to new scm/safe-utility-defs.scm
        new file scm/safe-utility-defs.scm
        All other scm files using define-safe-public now have
         (use-modules (scm safe-utility-defs)) call added.

At the current point of time, patchy should take master, _stay_ with it
and test it without bombing out, then suggesting to push to master
(which is somewhat pointless since that would be a noop, and we should
rather fastforward dev/staging, but one thing after the other).

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]