[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.15.18 regtests

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: 2.15.18 regtests
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:10:59 -0000

----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.18 regtests

On Nov 14, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>

Thanks Phil!
The beams seem OK to me - could you let me know which ones seem like they are worse off? I know that part of the code base well and can likely size it up relatively quickly.

The ones in the penultimate bar of and the 2nd beamed pair in beam-quanting-32nd, as well as the last pair in the 2nd measure. They all look a bit stumpy to my eyes.

Hey Phil,

The change in seems to bring that beam in line with all other beams that have tremolos, leaving less space between the tremolo and beam (which seems to be standard in traditionally typeset scores). As for the beam quanting, I actually think the stumpiness is desirable - the longer beams make the difference between the notes look larger than it actually is. I think the new beams look more in keeping with those around them.


Fine.  No worries.

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]