[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Output from

From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Output from
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:31:14 +0100

On Dec 17, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:

> On Dec 17, 2011, at 8:51 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Some of the output from make doc comes deliberately from regression tests. 
>> For example, puts lots of information similar 
>> to the following on the terminal screen:
>> Printing keys in verbose mode for: piccolocc   possibilities for one: (one 
>> oneT oneRT oneTR oneR oneRT1q one1qTR oneRT1h one1hTR oneRT3q one3qTR oneRTF 
>> oneFTR one1qT oneT1q one1q one1qT1h one1hT1q one1qT3q one3qT1q one1qTF 
>> oneFT1q one1hT oneT1h one1h one1hT3q one3qT1h one1hTF oneFT1h one3qT oneT3q 
>> one3q one3qTF oneFT3q oneFT oneF)
>> Thoughts, please?
> In this case, the regtest is really more documentation than regtest. I think 
> that simplifying and reducing the regtest is the right thing to do. 
> Thanks,
> Carl

This regtest makes sure that the key-name function works for all instruments - 
I'd be open to other options that do the same thing w/o printing all of this 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]