[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jan 2012 20:34:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:10:00PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> This is a live and learn. I typically don't add untracked files to patches,
> because there are loads of them - git-cl; the aborted_edits from lily-git,
> etc., etc. I'd not realised that updates from the LSR could also add files
> and so should not be caught out by this in the future. We probably need to
> add a information about this to
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/lsr-to-git
I wouldn't object to having something in the CG, but makelsr.py
ends with this:
Unsafe files printed in lsr-unsafe.txt: CHECK MANUALLY!
git add Documentation/snippets/*.ly
xargs git diff HEAD < lsr-unsafe.txt
That would have handled the untracked files.
Cheers,
- Graham
- What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Neil Puttock, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
- Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, David Kastrup, 2012/01/01
Re: What's the deal with the LSR update?, Phil Holmes, 2012/01/01