[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver
From: |
Jay Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:11:24 -0700 |
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:41 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Can you use git bisect for identifying the commit where things go wrong
> for you?
Git bisect results:
20670d51f8d97fd390210dd239b3b2427f071e7c is the first bad commit
commit 20670d51f8d97fd390210dd239b3b2427f071e7c
Author: Mike Solomon <address@hidden>
Date: Fri Sep 30 08:16:07 2011 +0200
It looks like this was reverted and a revised version was committed
the next day: 4f49b000d6e257724e311b406e2346b8388c1f0e. I've verified
that the commit right before this doesn't cause a segfault and this
one does. The only other information I have that's relevant is that
I've only seen this segfault happen on my 64-bit OS and not 32-bit.
-----Jay
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, address@hidden, 2012/01/01
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, Keith OHara, 2012/01/02
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, Jay Anderson, 2012/01/02
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, Keith OHara, 2012/01/03
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, David Kastrup, 2012/01/03
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, address@hidden, 2012/01/03
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, Jay Anderson, 2012/01/03
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, David Kastrup, 2012/01/04
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver,
Jay Anderson <=
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, David Kastrup, 2012/01/05
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, mike, 2012/01/05
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, David Kastrup, 2012/01/05
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, address@hidden, 2012/01/05
- Re: Segfault 2.15.23 Span_bar_stub_engraver, David Kastrup, 2012/01/05