[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:04:00 +0100 |
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> W dniu 7 stycznia 2012 01:40 użytkownik Carl Sorensen
> <address@hidden> napisał:
>>
>> On 1/6/12 4:25 PM, "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Of course we shouldn't change thickness too much. I'd say that it
>>> should be 0.51 or 0.52 staffspace.
>>>
>>> My research is here: http://www.sendspace.com/file/juulc4
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> Are you measuring staff space in pixels from the top of one staff line to
>> the top of the next staff line?
>
> Yes, exactly like that. I was often measuring one sample in several
> places (and estimating an average) because the shapes are not perfect.
>
Can you post regtest comparisons for us to look at?
Cheers,
MS
- suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/06
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/06
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/06
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Pavel Roskin, 2012/01/09
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Bernardo Barros, 2012/01/09
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/10
- Re: suggestion - increase default beam thickness, Pavel Roskin, 2012/01/13